Convert Hancom to MD

Yes. Markdown can preserve headings the converter identifies, along with useful text structure such as lists and sometimes tables, while discarding page-level styling. Complex visual layouts do not map perfectly because Markdown has a much simpler structure than Hancom.

The converter has to turn the visual page into one reading sequence. Simple columns usually follow naturally, but dense multi-column layouts, sidebars, or floating text can interleave in the Markdown output. If order matters, review those pages and rearrange the extracted text manually where needed.

Yes. Markdown is plain text with lightweight structure, so you can edit headings, lists, paragraphs, and recovered tables in any Markdown editor or text editor. The conversion is designed for reuse of the content, not for preserving the source page as a fixed visual document.

Visual documents can position text in columns, boxes, headers, and side areas without storing one obvious linear order. Markdown needs a sequence, so the converter infers one. Complex layouts can therefore place some blocks earlier or later than a human reader would expect.

Markdown is better when you want to keep lightweight structure such as headings, lists, and some tables for publishing or downstream processing. TXT is simpler when only the words matter. Neither route is intended to preserve the exact visual design of the original Hancom.